Autor: Norbert Finzsch

  • Widerstand in den USA (Organzation of American Historians)

    Academic Freedom as a Practice of Democracy

    At a panel during the Coalition for Action in Higher Education’s April 2025 national protest, urban and cultural studies scholar Davarian Baldwin made a rousing call for courage in the face of political and material repression in US colleges and universities: “We are the power that we have been waiting for.” Responding to this call, the 2026 volume of the AAUP’s Journal of Academic Freedom seeks to showcase work of students, educators, and activists—and of unions, scholarly associations, and other governance bodies—in fighting back against repression. We invite original scholarly articles grounded in a renewed notion of academic freedom as not only an abstract value or principle to be defended but also a living practice—as historian Joan Scott, among others, has put it—of research, teaching, and public engagement that articulates a democratic higher education and a democratic society.

    As a practice, academic freedom is embodied in the free, critical inquiry of students and scholars in their areas of expertise; in syllabi, curricula, and classrooms whose content is determined by experts rather than by administrators, boards of trustees, external special interest groups, or government agencies; and in the extramural speech and action of students and scholars, which are protected by the First Amendment and by AAUP principles. As recent court rulings have demonstrated, the practice of academic freedom unambiguously includes inquiry into, teaching about, and extramural speech and action pertaining to Palestine and other controversial topics. However, as experts on academic freedom have meticulously demonstrated, such practice is increasingly being delimited and circumscribed. National and international political discourses and federal investigations have pressured administrators—often all too willing to comply—to police protected speech and action on campuses, while the rise of neoliberal structures of governance at the expense of shared governance has created conditions of institutionalized disposability and precarity that further threaten the freedoms of academic workers. Under such conditions, the practice of academic freedom—resilient, defiant, and unwaveringly committed to the search for knowledge and the common good—itself becomes an instantiation of democracy over and against authoritarianism.

    To defend and fight for academic freedom is to defend and fight for democracy. With the explicit objective of contributing to this struggle, the new volume seeks submissions on initiatives that have been pursued, strategies that have been deployed, coalitions that have been built, and work that remains to be done in the fight for academic freedom.

    We will consider any eligible submission relevant to the journal’s core focus on academic freedom. Topics of special interest for the volume include but are not limited to

    • political education
    • public outreach
    • sanctuary campuses
    • mutual defense compacts and other forms of coalition-building
    • debt reveals
    • boycott, divestment, and sanctions campaigns
    • campus unionization
    • protests and other forms of mass mobilization
    • lawsuits
    • political lobbying

    The fight for academic freedom continues. But the efforts that have already been undertaken by educators and organizers suggest the formation of a new community both within and beyond the academy that is dedicated to the core freedoms on which any acceptable notion of the American university must be built—the freedom to think and to dream, to teach and to learn, to speak and to act, and to dissent in the face of authoritarianism and genocide. The proposed volume, which will be edited by Karim Mattar of the University of Colorado at Boulder, aims to help cultivate this community and these freedoms.


    Submissions of 2,000–5,000 words (including any notes and references) are due by March 9, 2026. The complete call for papers, our editorial policy, submission guidelines and instructions, and
    links to past volumes of the journal are available at https://www.aaup.org/CFP.

  • Akademie der Diözese Rottenburg-Stuttgart: Für eine demokratische Gesellschaft

    Historiker:innen gegen Angriffe auf die Freiheit der Wissenschaft

     

    https://www.akademie-rs.de//ueber-uns/newsletter-und-social-media/akademie-newsletter-nov-2025

  • Die „Professor Watchlist“ bedroht die Wissenschaftsfreiheit

    Die Professor Watchlist ist eine Website, die von der konservativen Organisation „Turning Point USA“ betrieben wird. Die Website listet akademisches Personal auf, das nach Ansicht von Turning Point „konservative Studenten diskriminiert, antiamerikanische Werte fördert und linke Propaganda im Klassenzimmer verbreitet“. Sie wurde 2016 ins Leben gerufen und hatte bis Dezember desselben Jahres etwa 200 Professoren aufgelistet. Jetzt gibt es eine Initiative der American Association of University Professors, sich selbst „anzuzeigen“ und so gegen die Liste zu protestieren. Bislang sind mehr als 12.000 Kolleg*innen dieser Aufforderung gefolgt.

  • Vortragsreihe zur kultursensitiven Psychiatrie an der Staatsbibliothek Berlin, 15.10.2925 bis 14.1.2026

    Vortragsreihe zur kultursensitiven Psychiatrie

    Deutschland ist ein Einwanderungsland, auch wenn Einige dies nicht wahrhaben wollen. Menschen aus allen Teilen der Erde leben in Deutschland, von denen viele eine Traumatisierung erfahren haben, weil sie unter beklagenswerten Umständen geflüchtet sind. Gewalterfahrungen vor und während der Flucht waren für sie allgegenwärtig. Unter diesen Geflüchteten befinden sich viele sehr junge Menschen und auch alleinstehende Kinder. Ihr Status in diesem Lande ist prekär. Ohne Sprachkenntnisse, ohne angemessene schulische Bildung und ohne therapeutische Betreuung sind sie sich selbst überlassen. Wir sind zurzeit nicht in der Lage, ihnen therapeutisch zu helfen, nicht nur, weil der politische Wille dazu fehlt, sondern auch, weil Therapeut:innen mit wenigen Ausnahmen nicht dafür ausgebildet sind, Menschen aus anderen Kulturen angemessen zu betreuen.https://blog.sbb.berlin/ethnopsychiatrie/

  • Seminar „Geschichte der Schwarzen Deutschen: BlPocs von 1600 bis 2024“

    Universität zu Köln. Institut für Afrikanistik und Ägyptologie.

    2 Semesterwochenstunden

    Sprache: Deutsch. Max. Teilnehmer: unbeschränkt.

    Freitags 09:00 – 13:00.

    Meister Ekkehart-Straße 7.

    50923 Köln

    Seminarraum rechts 2.10/2.11,

    Termine: 7.11.2025; 21.11.2025; 5.12.2025 und 19.12.2025.

     

  • Aktionswoche „Zeitalter der demokratischen Revolutionen“, 4.-14. Juli

    Die Jahrestage der Declaration of Independence am 4. Juli 1776 und des Sturms auf die Bastille in Paris am 14. Juli 1789 sind uns Anlass, an die demokratischen Revolutionen und Traditionen in Europa und den Amerikas zu erinnern.
     
    Elf Tage lang stellen wir zentrale historische Texte vor, die von Idealen und Erfolgen, aber auch Versäumnissen und dem Scheitern der demokratischen Revolutionen erzählen. Diese Quellen neu zu lesen, schärft den Blick auf unsere eigene Gegenwart. Stay tuned!

    Mehr dazu hier.

  • Statement on Academic Freedom by the NNW

    The German Network Sustainable Research (NNW) views with acute concern the escalating threats to academic freedom and institutional autonomy in the United States.
    These threats are not isolated incidents but part of a systematic, multi-pronged campaign to subordinate higher education to political agendas. They have alarming implications for the future of research and democratic discourse, which extend beyond the United States. Over the last months, we have seen that even private institutions of the highest standing are vulnerable to political and financial coercion. Often, the pressures from the outside are reinforced by the responses of university administrations, which act preemptively to avoid further sanctions, eroding academic autonomy from within.
    Thus, at Columbia University, the Trump administration imposed a series of coercive demands—including the reorganization of disciplinary procedures, the subordination of academic departments to direct presidential oversight, and the revision of curricula — as preconditions for the release of hundreds of millions in frozen research funding. Columbia’s compliance has set a dangerous precedent, demonstrating how financial leverage can be used to dismantle academic self-governance. The university’s adoption of a new definition of antisemitism and the expansion of its Tel Aviv Center, alongside the prohibition of demonstrations and masks on campus, illustrate how political pressure can rapidly alter both policy and academic culture.
    Harvard University has taken a different path, refusing to capitulate to federal demands and initiating legal action to challenge the administration’s overreach. However, the stakes are high: the government’s threat to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status or the efforts to halt international student admission are unprecedented interventions in the workings of a leading research institution. The administration’s demands—to abolish diversity initiatives, review student groups and academic programs, and subject hiring and admissions to external audits—strike at the heart of academic freedom and the principle of shared governance. The chilling effect on free expression and inquiry is already evident, as scholars report self-censorship and a growing climate of fear reminiscent of the McCarthy era.
    These interventions are not limited to explicit bans or legislative acts. They are enforced through financial threats, administrative overreach, and anticipatory compliance—often before any formal directive is issued. Websites are deleted, job postings rewritten, curricula adjusted, and staff sanctioned, all in response to perceived political pressures. The result is a climate of self-censorship and institutional timidity, where the pursuit of knowledge is increasingly constrained by external agendas.
    For Germany, recent events highlight growing concerns about academic freedom. Restrictions and pressures are increasingly evident, especially in the humanities and social sciences—fields that engage more often than others with the histories and experiences of minorities and marginalized groups. Such pressures may be reflected in the disinvitation of scholars due to their political profile, in increased scrutiny of research and teaching on sensitive political topics, and in strategic allegations of antisemitism. Universities must remain spaces where difficult questions can be asked and diverse perspectives can be discussed, free from undue political pressure. Although academic freedom is constitutionally protected, it faces challenges from both political and social actors. Additionally, the widespread use of fixed-term contracts and precarious employment conditions in academia as well as the universities’ grant dependency undermine the stability and independence necessary for genuine academic freedom.
    We therefore call for a robust, collective defense of academic freedom. We declare our solidarity with our colleagues in the United States and elsewhere who are hindered by political interference and control. We urge scholars, students, and the broader academic community (including our colleagues in administration) to actively resist the erosion of academic autonomy and fortify the university as a space for critical inquiry and democratic debate. From the events in the U.S. and other countries, we learn that this requires not only vigilance against external threats but also a critical examination of internal structures that undermine scholarly independence. We commit ourselves to defend the university as a vital node of civil society, where open discourse, critical inquiry, and the pursuit of truth remain non-negotiable.

    Prof. Dr. Ruth Mayer
    (on behalf of the Network Sustainable Research/Netzwerk Nachhaltige Wissenschaft)

  • Protest der American Historical Association gegen die Entfernung von 381 Büchern aus dem Bestand der Nimitz Library

    The American Historical Association has released a statement condemning “the removal of 381 books, including acclaimed historical works and widely used primary sources, from the United States Naval Academy’s Nimitz Library” as well as “what appears to be the expansion of this censorship policy to the full universe of military academies and other education institutions.” “Removing books that are based on careful historical research won’t make the facts of our nation’s history go away,” the statement reads. “But it will render the military unprepared to face their legacies and our future.”